Introduction
Cricket is one of the most popular sports in the world, with millions of fans across the globe. Over the years, there have been many great cricketers who have achieved legendary status in the game. Among them, two of the most notable names are Virat Kohli and Steve Smith. Both players have had outstanding careers and have consistently been among the top batsmen in the world. In this essay, we will compare the careers of Kohli and Smith to determine who deserves the title of the "King of Cricket."
Early Life and Career
Virat Kohli was born on November 5, 1988, in Delhi, India. He started playing cricket at a young age and showed immense talent from the beginning. He made his first-class debut for Delhi in 2006 and was selected for the Indian team in 2008. Kohli initially struggled to establish himself in the Indian team but soon became a regular member of the side.
On the other hand, Steve Smith was born on June 2, 1989, in Sydney, Australia. He started playing cricket at a young age and made his first-class debut for New South Wales in 2008. Smith was initially considered a promising talent but struggled to make an impact in the Australian team. However, he soon established himself as a top-class batsman.
Batting Records
One of the most important criteria for comparing the two players is their batting records. Virat Kohli has been a consistent performer for India across all formats of the game. He has scored 12,169 runs in 254 innings at an average of 59.07 in ODIs, 7,490 runs in 91 innings at an average of 51.41 in Tests, and 3,159 runs in 90 innings at an average of 52.65 in T20Is. Kohli has also scored 70 international centuries, including 43 in ODIs, 27 in Tests, and 0 in T20Is.
On the other hand, Steve Smith has also been a prolific run-scorer for Australia. He has scored 7,540 runs in 150 innings at an average of 61.80 in Tests, 4,431 runs in 128 innings at an average of 43.09 in ODIs, and 794 runs in 44 innings at an average of 27.37 in T20Is. Smith has also scored 29 international centuries, including 27 in Tests, 8 in ODIs, and 0 in T20Is.
From these records, it is clear that Kohli has a better overall record than Smith. Kohli has a higher average in all three formats of the game and has scored more centuries in total. However, it is important to note that Smith has played fewer matches than Kohli, particularly in ODIs and T20Is. Therefore, the comparison should also take into account the number of matches played by both players.
Performance in Different Conditions
Another important factor to consider is the performance of both players in different conditions. Kohli has been a prolific scorer on all types of pitches and has a good record both at home and away. He has scored heavily in India, Australia, South Africa, England, and other countries.
Smith, on the other hand, has also performed well in different conditions, particularly in Tests. He has been a standout performer in Australia, where he has scored heavily and averages over 70. However, his record in other countries is not as impressive. He averages just over 40 in England and South Africa, and around 30 in India.
Captaincy Record
Another important factor to consider is the captaincy record of both players. Virat Kohli has been the captain of the Indian team in all formats since 2017. Under his leadership, India has been a dominant force in world cricket, winning numerous series and tournaments. Kohli has led India to victories in the 2018 U-19 World Cup, 2019 World Cup, and 2021 ICC World Test Championship. He also led India to the No.1 ranking in Tests and ODIs.
Steve Smith, on the other hand, was the captain of the Australian team from 2015 to 2018 before being banned due to his involvement in the ball-tampering scandal. Under Smith's leadership, Australia won the 2015 World Cup and regained the No.1 ranking in Tests. However, Smith's captaincy was marred by the ball-tampering controversy, which led to his suspension and a significant dent in his reputation.
Overall, Kohli has a better captaincy record than Smith. He has led India to more significant victories and has been a more successful and respected captain. While Smith's achievements as captain cannot be ignored, his involvement in the ball-tampering scandal has tarnished his legacy.
Leadership and Personality
Apart from their on-field performances, it is also important to consider the leadership and personality of both players. Virat Kohli is known for his aggressive and passionate approach to the game. He is a fierce competitor who always gives his all on the field. Kohli's leadership style is also known for being aggressive, and he is not afraid to take risks or make bold decisions.
Steve Smith, on the other hand, is known for his unorthodox and unconventional style of play. He is a player who likes to take risks and play his shots. Smith's leadership style is also known for being unorthodox, and he often comes up with innovative ideas and strategies.
Overall, both players have their unique leadership styles and personalities. Kohli's aggressive approach has worked well for him and his team, while Smith's unorthodox style has also yielded results. It ultimately depends on personal preference and the team's requirements when it comes to leadership style and personality.
Conclusion
In conclusion, both Virat Kohli and Steve Smith are exceptional cricketers who have achieved great success in their careers. However, when it comes to comparing the two, Kohli has a better overall record, better performance in different conditions, and a more successful captaincy record. While Smith's achievements cannot be ignored, his involvement in the ball-tampering scandal has significantly impacted his legacy. Ultimately, the title of "King of Cricket" is subjective and depends on personal opinion. Both players have their unique strengths and qualities that make them great cricketers in their own right.
0 Comments